There was a run on the bank today. I nearly missed it.
I played a waiting game. I dislike waiting. When I observed most of my colleagues heading across during the first break, I decided the clear game solution was for me to wait to the second coffee break so I wouldn't have to wait so long in line. They indeed got back late, it taking more than 45 minutes to service them all.
When I eventually went with just three other colleagues, I was feeling pretty good about my choice. But then one of us told a joke: the bank was out of money and would only have enough for him and not for us.
I suddenly realized that if I were in a bank run game, I had played the entirely wrong strategy. Observing other people racing to get their money out in the early period, I ought to have gone early also. We covered that extensively in the Cornell macro group – sunspots determining bank runs, psychology determining bank runs, self-reinforcing beliefs, on and on. If you see other people running, run.
When I get back to AUN, I will be introducing my game theory class to risk and uncertainty. What if there is a probability p that I’m playing the bank run game and probability (1-p) I’m playing a waiting game? At what critical value of p should I go with the first group instead of with the second? I smell a midterm question. And if you’re in Eco 404 this semester, you’re welcome.
Unlike the Federal Reserve, it appears that some central banks are unwilling/unable to.prop up failing banks.
ReplyDelete